NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 200 Watt
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 200 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Environ 71% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 945 MHz
- Environ 32% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1380 MHz
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 versus 498
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15652 versus 10967
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 versus 63532
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 versus 14496
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 versus 14496
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 945 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1380 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 versus 498 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15652 versus 10967 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 versus 63532 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 versus 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 versus 14496 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 498 | 705 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10967 | 15652 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63532 | 105171 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.203 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.999 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 110.761 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1370.281 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | N19E-Q1 | TU104 |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 249 | 138 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1380 MHz | 1815 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 945 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 198.7 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10800 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | Large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
IntelArc Pro A50
