NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and NVIDIA TITAN RTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 280 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 18 December 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 280 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 2560
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- 2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 15164 vs 7438
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 827 vs 551
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19986 vs 12627
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 19529
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 19529
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4608 vs 2560 |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15164 vs 7438 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 827 vs 551 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19986 vs 12627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 19529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 19529 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | 15164 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 551 | 827 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12627 | 19986 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3353 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 18 December 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 171 | 90 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1110 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 4608 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 280 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
