NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs AMD Radeon R7 240
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and AMD Radeon R7 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 98% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 14262.8x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- 7.2x more pipelines: 2304 vs 320
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 41% higher memory clock speed: 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 1150 MHz
- 16x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85209 vs 5331
- 17.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 vs 13.344
- 12.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 vs 290.632
- 19.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 vs 1.262
- 6.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.223 vs 21.59
- 16.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1011.233 vs 60.326
- 12x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 1688
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 2342
- 12x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 1688
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 2342
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 vs 8 October 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 320 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 1150 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 vs 5331 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 vs 13.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 vs 290.632 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 vs 1.262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 vs 21.59 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 vs 60.326 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 1688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 2342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 1688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 2342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 160 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 240
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 | 5331 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 13.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 290.632 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 1.262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 21.59 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 60.326 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 1688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 2342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 1688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 2342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 | 0 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 902 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 274 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon R7 240 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | Oland |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 | 8 October 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $69 |
| Place in performance rating | 211 | 1236 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Price now | $49.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 24.92 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 320 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 1,040 million |
| Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 320 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | N / A |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 416.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 1150 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
IntelArc Pro A30M
