NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 versus AMD Radeon R7 240
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and AMD Radeon R7 240 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 98% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 780 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 222.5 GTexel/s versus 15.6 GTexel / s
- 7.2x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 320
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 41% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) versus 1150 MHz
- 16x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 85209 versus 5331
- 17.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 versus 13.344
- 12.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 versus 290.632
- 19.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 versus 1.262
- 6.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.223 versus 21.59
- 16.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1011.233 versus 60.326
- 12x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 versus 1688
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 2342
- 12x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 versus 1688
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 2342
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 versus 8 October 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 780 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s versus 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 320 |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) versus 1150 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 versus 5331 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 versus 13.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 versus 290.632 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 versus 1.262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 versus 21.59 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 versus 60.326 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 1688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 2342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 1688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 2342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3353 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 240
- 3.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 160 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 160 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 240
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 | 5331 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 13.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 290.632 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 1.262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 21.59 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 60.326 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 1688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 2342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 1688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 2342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 | 0 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 902 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 274 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon R7 240 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | TU104 | Oland |
| Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 | 8 October 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | $69 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 211 | 1236 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Prix maintenant | $49.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 24.92 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 320 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 1,040 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 499.2 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 320 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Longeur | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 168 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | N / A |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 416.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 1150 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
IntelArc Pro A30M
