NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1124 MHz
• 4948.8x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
• 3.6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 640
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 7.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85209 vs 12020
• 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 vs 40.695
• 6.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 vs 588.094
• 7.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 vs 3.205
• 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.223 vs 30.455
• 6.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1011.233 vs 166.26
• 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 4921
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 1577
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1671
• 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 4921
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 1577
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1671
• Around 57% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1873 vs 1193

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 1005 MHz
• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 160 Watt
• 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	85209 12020
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	232.933 40.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3728.135 588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.872 3.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	136.223 30.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1011.233 166.26
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20206 4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20206 4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 1671
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1873 1193

Compare specifications (specs)