NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA Quadro M4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 773 MHz
- 2767.8x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 80.39 GTexel / s
- Around 38% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1664
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85209 vs 18372
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 vs 65.548
- 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 vs 732.046
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 vs 5.453
- 7.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.223 vs 17.725
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1011.233 vs 217.357
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 6291
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3332
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 6291
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3332
- 2.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1873 vs 680
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 vs 29 June 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz vs 773 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 80.39 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1664 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 vs 18372 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 vs 65.548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 vs 732.046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 vs 5.453 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 vs 17.725 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 vs 217.357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 6291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 6291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3332 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 vs 680 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 3.7x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 160 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 | 18372 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 65.548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 732.046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 5.453 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 17.725 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 217.357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 6291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 6291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3332 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 | 680 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | GM204 |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 | 29 June 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $791 |
| Place in performance rating | 211 | 534 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Price now | $765.93 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.68 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 773 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1664 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s | 80.39 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 5,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,573 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
| Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 241 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 416.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
IntelArc Pro A30M
