NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 versus NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA Quadro M4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 30% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1005 MHz versus 773 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 222.5 GTexel/s versus 80.39 GTexel / s
- Environ 38% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 1664
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 4.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 85209 versus 18372
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 versus 65.548
- 5.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 versus 732.046
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 versus 5.453
- 7.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.223 versus 17.725
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1011.233 versus 217.357
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 versus 6291
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 3685
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3332
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 versus 6291
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 3685
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3332
- 2.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1873 versus 680
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 versus 29 June 2015 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz versus 773 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s versus 80.39 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 1664 |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 versus 18372 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 versus 65.548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 versus 732.046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 versus 5.453 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 versus 17.725 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 versus 217.357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 6291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 6291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3332 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 versus 680 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 160 Watt
- 3.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 160 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 | 18372 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 65.548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 732.046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 5.453 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 17.725 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 217.357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 6291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 6291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3332 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 | 680 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | TU104 | GM204 |
| Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 | 29 June 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | $791 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 211 | 534 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Prix maintenant | $765.93 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.68 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 773 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1664 |
| Débit de remplissage de pixels | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s | 80.39 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 5,200 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,573 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
| Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync | |
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 241 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 416.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
IntelArc Pro A30M
