NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 versus NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA Quadro M4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 30% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1005 MHz versus 773 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 222.5 GTexel/s versus 80.39 GTexel / s
- Environ 38% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 1664
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 4.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 85209 versus 18372
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 versus 65.548
- 5.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 versus 732.046
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 versus 5.453
- 7.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.223 versus 17.725
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1011.233 versus 217.357
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 versus 6291
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 3685
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3332
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 versus 6291
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 3685
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3332
- 2.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1873 versus 680
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 versus 29 June 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz versus 773 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s versus 80.39 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 1664 |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 versus 18372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 versus 65.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 versus 732.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 versus 5.453 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 versus 17.725 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 versus 217.357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 versus 680 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 160 Watt
- 3.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 160 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 | 18372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 65.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 732.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 5.453 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 17.725 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 217.357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 | 680 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | TU104 | GM204 |
Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 | 29 June 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | $791 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 211 | 534 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix maintenant | $765.93 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.68 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 773 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1664 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s | 80.39 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 5,200 million |
Performance á point flottant | 2,573 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync | |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 241 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 416.0 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 6008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |