NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1480 MHz
- 1342x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85209 vs 42289
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 vs 152.325
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 vs 1590.392
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 vs 11.365
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.223 vs 45.977
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1011.233 vs 751.626
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 15267
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 15267
- Around 68% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1873 vs 1115
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 vs 6 February 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1480 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1792 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 vs 42289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 vs 152.325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 vs 1590.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 vs 11.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 vs 45.977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 vs 751.626 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 15267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 15267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 vs 1115 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1202 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
| Core clock speed | 1202 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 160 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 | 42289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 152.325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 1590.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 11.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 45.977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 751.626 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 15267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 15267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 | 1115 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11545 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU104 | GP104 |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 | 6 February 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $815 |
| Place in performance rating | 211 | 287 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Price now | $799.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.17 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1480 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1202 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s | 165.8 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 4x DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 241 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 416.0 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 7604 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Stereo | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
IntelArc Pro A30M
