NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 versus NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1480 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 222.5 GTexel/s versus 165.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 29% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 1792
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 85209 versus 42289
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 versus 152.325
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 versus 1590.392
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 versus 11.365
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.223 versus 45.977
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1011.233 versus 751.626
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 versus 15267
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 versus 15267
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1873 versus 1115
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 versus 6 February 2017 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1480 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s versus 165.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 1792 |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 versus 42289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 versus 152.325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 versus 1590.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 versus 11.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 versus 45.977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 versus 751.626 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 15267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 15267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 versus 1115 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- Environ 20% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1202 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 60% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 160 Watt
- 4.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7604 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
| Vitesse du noyau | 1202 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 160 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7604 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 | 42289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 152.325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 1590.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 11.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 45.977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 751.626 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 15267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 15267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 | 1115 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11545 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU104 | GP104 |
| Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 | 6 February 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | $815 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 211 | 287 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Prix maintenant | $799.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.17 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1480 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1202 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s | 165.8 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 7,200 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,304 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 4x DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 241 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 416.0 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 7604 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Stereo | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
IntelArc Pro A30M
