NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1468 MHz
- 1262.7x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 234.9 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 11482
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 17105
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 17105
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 27 June 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1468 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 234.9 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 vs 11482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 vs 17105 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 vs 17105 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 731 vs 705
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5581 vs 3714
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5581 vs 3714
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 731 vs 705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5581 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5581 vs 3714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 731 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 | 11482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 | 17105 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 | 17105 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 5581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 5581 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 6008 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 45938 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU104 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 175 | 182 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1468 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.492 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 234.9 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 7,516 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 320.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
IntelArc A730M
