NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
- 5x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1612 MHz
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1612 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3713 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 795 / 1230 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- 10.7x more pipelines: 8192 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14208 vs 8878
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14208 vs 8878
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 917 vs 441
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15977 vs 6724
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98432 vs 33759
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 795 / 1230 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Pipelines | 8192 vs 768 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 vs 8878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 vs 8878 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 vs 441 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 vs 6724 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98432 vs 33759 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8878 | 14208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8878 | 14208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3359 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 | 917 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6724 | 15977 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33759 | 98432 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.1 |
| Code name | N19P-Q1 | Vega 20 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | Dec 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 364 | 160 |
| Type | Mobile Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1720 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz | 1574 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 8192 |
| Compute units | 64 | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 13230 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 4096 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
ATIFireGL V8600
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro K6000
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro S9050
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M
