NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 855 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 1024 vs 64
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 vs 3751
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 vs 3751
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 64 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 vs 3751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 vs 3751 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 2476
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2238
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 2476
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2238
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 2238 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40286 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 3751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 3751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) |
| Code name | TU117 | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 |
| Place in performance rating | 350 | 655 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | 2.25 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 64 |
| Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 91.20 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR4 |
| Shared memory | Yes | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon E8870
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P4
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 570X
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
