NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile versus Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- 2.9x plus de vitesse du noyau: 855 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1425 MHz versus 1100 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 1024 versus 64
- Environ 39% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 18 Watt versus 25 Watt
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 versus 3751
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 versus 3751
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 855 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1024 versus 64 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt versus 25 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 versus 3751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 versus 3751 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 2476
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 2238
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 2476
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 2238
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 12 nm |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 2238 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40286 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 3751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 3751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3353 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) |
| Nom de code | TU117 | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 350 | 655 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
| Date de sortie | 28 May 2019 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 855 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | 2.25 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 64 |
| Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 91.20 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | DDR4 |
| Mémoire partagé | Yes | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon E8870
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P4
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 570X
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
