NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1178 MHz
836.7x more texture fill rate: 91.20 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
8.2x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 148 Watt
178.6x more memory clock speed: 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39772 vs 28470
Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 vs 105.107
Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 vs 1225.96
Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.833 vs 8.76
3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 vs 35.714
Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 vs 489.884

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1425 MHz vs 1178 MHz
Texture fill rate	91.20 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	18 Watt vs 148 Watt
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	39772 vs 28470
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	157.821 vs 105.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1934.012 vs 1225.96
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.833 vs 8.76
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	136.552 vs 35.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	684.333 vs 489.884

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 855 MHz
Around 63% higher pipelines: 1664 vs 1024
Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9633 vs 7777
Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 473
Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 9851
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 2476
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2238
Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 9851
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 2476
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2238

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1050 MHz vs 855 MHz
Pipelines	1664 vs 1024
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	9633 vs 7777
PassMark - G2D Mark	766 vs 473
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11499 vs 9851
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698 vs 2476
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3340 vs 2238
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11499 vs 9851
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698 vs 2476
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3340 vs 2238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7777

9633

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

473

766

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

39772

28470

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

157.821

105.107

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1934.012

1225.96

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10.833

8.76

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

136.552

35.714

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

684.333

489.884

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9851

11499

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2476

3698

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2238

3340

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9851

11499

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2476

3698

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2238

3340

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
PassMark - G3D Mark	7777	9633
PassMark - G2D Mark	473	766
Geekbench - OpenCL	39772	28470
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	157.821	105.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1934.012	1225.96
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.833	8.76
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	136.552	35.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	684.333	489.884
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9851	11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2476	3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2238	3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9851	11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2476	3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2238	3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		3631

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	TU117	GM204
Place in performance rating	362	360
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch date		19 September 2014
Launch price (MSRP)		$329
Price now		$407.76
Value for money (0-100)		28.59
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1425 MHz	1178 MHz
Core clock speed	855 MHz	1050 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	91.20 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	5.837 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.918 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	1664
Pixel fill rate	45.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	91.20 GTexel/s	109 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	18 Watt	148 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	5,200 million
CUDA cores		1664
Floating-point performance		3,920 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature		98 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)		500 Watt
SLI options		4x
Supplementary power connectors		2x 6-pins
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	224 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)	7.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround