NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1188 MHz
1853.7x more texture fill rate: 91.20 GTexel/s vs 49.2 billion / sec
Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
5x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 90 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
208.3x more memory clock speed: 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) vs 6.6 GB/s
Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7788 vs 5340
2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40286 vs 16728
2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 vs 60.473
2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 vs 758.865
2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.833 vs 4.279
4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 vs 29.738
3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 vs 231.508
Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 vs 6803
Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 vs 6803

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1425 MHz vs 1188 MHz
Texture fill rate	91.20 GTexel/s vs 49.2 billion / sec
Pipelines	1024 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	18 Watt vs 90 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) vs 6.6 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7788 vs 5340
Geekbench - OpenCL	40286 vs 16728
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	157.821 vs 60.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1934.012 vs 758.865
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.833 vs 4.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	136.552 vs 29.738
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	684.333 vs 231.508
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9851 vs 6803
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9851 vs 6803

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 855 MHz
Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 641 vs 483
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 vs 2476
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2238
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 vs 2476
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2238

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1024 MHz vs 855 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	641 vs 483
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3697 vs 2476
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 2238
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3697 vs 2476
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 2238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7788

5340

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

483

641

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

40286

16728

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

157.821

60.473

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1934.012

758.865

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10.833

4.279

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

136.552

29.738

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

684.333

231.508

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9851

6803

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2476

3697

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2238

3356

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9851

6803

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2476

3697

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2238

3356

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
PassMark - G3D Mark	7788	5340
PassMark - G2D Mark	483	641
Geekbench - OpenCL	40286	16728
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	157.821	60.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1934.012	758.865
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.833	4.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	136.552	29.738
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	684.333	231.508
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9851	6803
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2476	3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2238	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9851	6803
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2476	3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2238	3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		105

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	TU117	GM206
Place in performance rating	350	547
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch date		20 August 2015
Launch price (MSRP)		$159
Price now		$194.44
Value for money (0-100)		30.06
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1425 MHz	1188 MHz
Core clock speed	855 MHz	1024 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	91.20 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	5.837 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.918 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	768
Pixel fill rate	45.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	91.20 GTexel/s	49.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	18 Watt	90 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	2,940 million
CUDA cores		768
Floating-point performance		1,825 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		7.938" (20.2 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)		350 Watt
SLI options		2x
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pins
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	105.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)	6.6 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround