NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1290 MHz
Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1392 MHz
1962.2x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7235 vs 5029
2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 17466
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 7043
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 7043
27.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3319 vs 122

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 25 October 2016
Core clock speed	1575 MHz vs 1290 MHz
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz vs 1392 MHz
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7235 vs 5029
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863 vs 17466
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313 vs 7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698 vs 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313 vs 7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698 vs 3685
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319 vs 122

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 vs 430

Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	457 vs 430
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7235

5029

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

430

457

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

38863

17466

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

7043

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3360

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

7043

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3360

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3319

122

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark	7235	5029
PassMark - G2D Mark	430	457
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863	17466
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313	7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313	7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3360
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319	122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		223.683

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Code name	TU117	GP107
Launch date	27 May 2019	25 October 2016
Place in performance rating	362	586
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$109
Price now		$124.99
Value for money (0-100)		56.95
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	1392 MHz
Core clock speed	1575 MHz	1290 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	640
Pixel fill rate	57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s	58.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	3,300 million
CUDA cores		640
Floating-point performance		1,862 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature		97 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Height		4.38" (11.1 cm)
Length		5.7" (14.5 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)		300 Watt
Supplementary power connectors		None
Width		2-slot
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	112 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
GameStream
GPU Boost
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
ShadowWorks
VR Ready