NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1493 MHz
Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1620 MHz
1468.6x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 77.76 GTexel / s
Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7235 vs 5918
Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 323
Around 87% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 20732
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 8496
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3336
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 8496
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3336
Around 42% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3319 vs 2340

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 1 February 2017
Core clock speed	1575 MHz vs 1493 MHz
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz vs 1620 MHz
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s vs 77.76 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7235 vs 5918
PassMark - G2D Mark	430 vs 323
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863 vs 20732
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313 vs 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698 vs 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313 vs 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698 vs 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319 vs 2340

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7235

5918

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

430

323

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

38863

20732

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

8496

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

3687

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3336

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

8496

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

3687

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3336

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3319

2340

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
PassMark - G3D Mark	7235	5918
PassMark - G2D Mark	430	323
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863	20732
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313	8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698	3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313	8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698	3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319	2340
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		301.168

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Code name	TU117	GP106B
Launch date	27 May 2019	1 February 2017
Place in performance rating	362	533
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	1620 MHz
Core clock speed	1575 MHz	1493 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	768
Pixel fill rate	57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s	77.76 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	4,400 million
Floating-point performance		2,488 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	112.1 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection