NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1046 MHz
• Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1124 MHz
• 2540x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
• Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 68 Watt
• Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7235 vs 3572
• 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 12020
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 4921
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1577
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1671
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 4921
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1577
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1671
• 2.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3319 vs 1193

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 548 vs 430

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7235 3572
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	430 548
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	38863 12020
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9313 4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3698 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9313 4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3698 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 1671
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3319 1193

Compare specifications (specs)