NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Tesla K20m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
2.2x more core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 706 MHz
777.9x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 146.8 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
3.8x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 225 Watt
Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5200 MHz
Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7153 vs 4432
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 452 vs 210
2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 14510
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 8319
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 8319

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 5 January 2013
Core clock speed	1575 MHz vs 706 MHz
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s vs 146.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 225 Watt
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz vs 5200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7153 vs 4432
PassMark - G2D Mark	452 vs 210
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863 vs 14510
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313 vs 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313 vs 8319

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m

2.4x more pipelines: 2496 vs 1024
Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7337 vs 3698
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10873 vs 3353
Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7337 vs 3698
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10873 vs 3353

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2496 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	5 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	7337 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	10873 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	7337 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	10873 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7153

4432

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

452

210

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

38863

14510

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

8319

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

7337

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

10873

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

8319

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

7337

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

10873

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	NVIDIA Tesla K20m
PassMark - G3D Mark	7153	4432
PassMark - G2D Mark	452	210
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863	14510
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313	8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698	7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	10873
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313	8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698	7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	10873
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		54.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1414.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		5.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		83.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		250.291

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	NVIDIA Tesla K20m
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Code name	TU117	GK110
Launch date	27 May 2019	5 January 2013
Place in performance rating	368	408
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$3,199
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz
Core clock speed	1575 MHz	706 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	2496
Pixel fill rate	57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s	146.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	7,080 million
Floating-point performance		3,524 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		267 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	5 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	208.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	5200 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5