NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- 4.2x more texture fill rate: 145.2 GTexel/s vs 34.62 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9765 vs 2398
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 493 vs 411
- 4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 56688 vs 14219
- 7.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 vs 25.896
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2138.158 vs 486.804
- 6.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 vs 2.503
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 vs 53.111
- 7.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 729.947 vs 100.658
- 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12750 vs 2524
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 3274
- 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12750 vs 2524
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 3274
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s vs 34.62 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9765 vs 2398 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 493 vs 411 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56688 vs 14219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 vs 25.896 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 vs 486.804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 vs 2.503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 vs 53.111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 vs 100.658 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 vs 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 vs 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3352 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9765 | 2398 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 493 | 411 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56688 | 14219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 25.896 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 486.804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 2.503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 53.111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 100.658 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3352 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Polaris |
| Code name | GA106 | Lexa |
| Place in performance rating | 272 | 841 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1082 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 86.56 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | 1,385 GFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | 1,385 GFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | 17.31 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 34.62 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 2200 million |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Height | Half Height | |
| Length | 6.6" (168 mm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT400 4GB
