NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

• Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1201 MHz
• 1889.1x more texture fill rate: 145.2 GTexel/s vs 76.86 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9765 vs 3676
• 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 56688 vs 17696
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 vs 55.077
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2138.158 vs 830.773
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 vs 4.132
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 vs 82.584
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 729.947 vs 225.985
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12750 vs 5431
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 1123
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 2678
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12750 vs 5431
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 1123
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 2678

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

• Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 735 MHz
• Around 90% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 95 Watt
• 4x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 634 vs 493

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9765 3676
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	493 634
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	56688 17696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	202.984 55.077
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2138.158 830.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.498 4.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	151.433 82.584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	729.947 225.985
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12750 5431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 2678
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12750 5431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 2678

Compare specifications (specs)