NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 390
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 390 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 82% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 907.5x more texture fill rate: 145.2 GTexel/s vs 160.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 275 Watt
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1000 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9962 vs 8928
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 56990 vs 44120
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 vs 120.267
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 vs 11.097
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 vs 116.473
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 729.947 vs 607.381
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12750 vs 10445
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12750 vs 10445
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s vs 160.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 275 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9962 vs 8928 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56990 vs 44120 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 vs 120.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 vs 11.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 vs 116.473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 vs 607.381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 vs 10445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 vs 10445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 799 vs 476
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3164.164 vs 2138.158
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 799 vs 476 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3164.164 vs 2138.158 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9962 | 8928 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 799 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56990 | 44120 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 120.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 3164.164 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 11.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 116.473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 607.381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 10445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 10445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3957 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 390 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | GA106 | Grenada |
| Place in performance rating | 267 | 296 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2015 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 160.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 6,200 million |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Floating-point performance | 5,120 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Length | 275 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 512 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
