NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q and NVIDIA Quadro 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

NVIDIA Quadro 6000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 3132 MHz vs 2988 MHz
Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.784 vs 24.377
Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.512 vs 793.755
Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.125 vs 2.66
Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 vs 34.891
Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 93.533 vs 90.839

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	25 July 2011 vs 10 December 2010
Memory clock speed	3132 MHz vs 2988 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	24.784 vs 24.377
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	917.512 vs 793.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.125 vs 2.66
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	44.227 vs 34.891
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	93.533 vs 90.839

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 6000

Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 204 Watt vs 225 Watt
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2685 vs 1306

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	204 Watt vs 225 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	446 vs 444
PassMark - G3D Mark	2685 vs 1306

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 6000

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

24.784

24.377

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

917.512

793.755

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.125

2.66

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

44.227

34.891

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

93.533

90.839

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

444

446

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1306

2685

Name	NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q	NVIDIA Quadro 6000
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	24.784	24.377
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	917.512	793.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.125	2.66
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	44.227	34.891
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	93.533	90.839
PassMark - G2D Mark	444	446
PassMark - G3D Mark	1306	2685
Geekbench - OpenCL		9845
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		3501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		3501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3335

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q	NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi	Fermi
Code name	GF100	GF100
Launch date	25 July 2011	10 December 2010
Launch price (MSRP)	$5,489	$4,399
Place in performance rating	789	792
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Price now		$332.21
Value for money (0-100)		12.86
Technical info
Core clock speed	574 MHz	574 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,027.7 gflops	1,027.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	448	448
Texture fill rate	32.1 GTexel / s	32.1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	204 Watt
Transistor count	3,100 million	3,100 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	248 mm	248 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	150.3 GB / s	143.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	384 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	3132 MHz	2988 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5