NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P5000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 901.6x more memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 10 GB/s
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 223.558 vs 150.103
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2698.914 vs 2036.763
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.206 vs 14.035
- 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 140.845 vs 27.417
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 927.006 vs 819.934
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15489 vs 11173
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15489 vs 11173
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 October 2016 vs 27 May 2016 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 10 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 223.558 vs 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2698.914 vs 2036.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.206 vs 14.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.845 vs 27.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 927.006 vs 819.934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15489 vs 11173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15489 vs 11173 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15537 vs 12544
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 887 vs 674
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55438 vs 52468
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 3409
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 3077
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 3409
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 3077
- Around 25% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7536 vs 6008
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 2048 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15537 vs 12544 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 887 vs 674 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55438 vs 52468 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 vs 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 vs 3077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 vs 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 vs 3077 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7536 vs 6008 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12544 | 15537 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 674 | 887 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52468 | 55438 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 223.558 | 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2698.914 | 2036.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.206 | 14.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.845 | 27.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 927.006 | 819.934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15489 | 11173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3409 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3077 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15489 | 11173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3409 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3077 | 3343 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6008 | 7536 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | GP104 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 1 October 2016 | 27 May 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | $599 |
| Place in performance rating | 244 | 273 |
| Price now | $1,699.99 | $439.99 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.38 | 43.72 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz | 1733 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2560 |
| Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | 7,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 320 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz | 10 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Stereo | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P5000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P5000 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAQuadro P5000 vs
NVIDIATesla P40
NVIDIAQuadro P5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro P5000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000
NVIDIAQuadro P5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro P5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
