NVIDIA Quadro P5000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P5000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P5000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 80% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 180 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- 901.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 9016 MHz versus 10 GB/s
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 223.558 versus 150.103
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2698.914 versus 2036.763
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.206 versus 14.035
- 5.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 140.845 versus 27.417
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 927.006 versus 819.934
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15489 versus 11173
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15489 versus 11173
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 October 2016 versus 27 May 2016 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 9016 MHz versus 10 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 223.558 versus 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2698.914 versus 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.206 versus 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.845 versus 27.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 927.006 versus 819.934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15489 versus 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15489 versus 11173 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 2048
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15537 versus 12544
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 887 versus 674
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55438 versus 52468
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 versus 3409
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 versus 3077
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 versus 3409
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 versus 3077
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7536 versus 6008
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 2048 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15537 versus 12544 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 887 versus 674 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55438 versus 52468 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 3077 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7536 versus 6008 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12544 | 15537 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 674 | 887 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52468 | 55438 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 223.558 | 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2698.914 | 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.206 | 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.845 | 27.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 927.006 | 819.934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15489 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3409 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3077 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15489 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3409 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3077 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6008 | 7536 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP104 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 1 October 2016 | 27 May 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,499 | $599 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 244 | 273 |
Prix maintenant | $1,699.99 | $439.99 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.38 | 43.72 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1733 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 8,873 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2560 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 277.3 GTexel / s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 180 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 7,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB / s | 320 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 9016 MHz | 10 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |