AMD FirePro S9000 versus AMD Radeon HD 6970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro S9000 and AMD Radeon HD 6970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro S9000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 19% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 100.8 GTexel / s versus 84.5 GTexel / s
- Environ 17% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1536
- Environ 19% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,226 gflops versus 2,703.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 57% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 350 Watt versus 550 Watt
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 2 GB
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5500 MHz versus 1375 MHz
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5059 versus 2839
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 561 versus 432
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.886 versus 1.835
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 24 August 2012 versus 14 December 2010 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 100.8 GTexel / s versus 84.5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 versus 1536 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,226 gflops versus 2,703.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt versus 550 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5500 MHz versus 1375 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5059 versus 2839 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 561 versus 432 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.886 versus 1.835 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6970
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.676 versus 9.541
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 920.398 versus 275.278
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.219 versus 30.049
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 273.175 versus 91.842
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.676 versus 9.541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 920.398 versus 275.278 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.219 versus 30.049 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 273.175 versus 91.842 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3357 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S9000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6970
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD FirePro S9000 | AMD Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5059 | 2839 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 561 | 432 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.541 | 18.676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 275.278 | 920.398 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.886 | 1.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.049 | 52.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.842 | 273.175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3358 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35739 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5372 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5372 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD FirePro S9000 | AMD Radeon HD 6970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Nom de code | Tahiti | Cayman |
| Date de sortie | 24 August 2012 | 14 December 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,499 | $369 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 684 | 662 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Prix maintenant | $94.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 48.01 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,226 gflops | 2,703.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 100.8 GTexel / s | 84.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 550 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,313 million | 2,640 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 880 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 264 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5500 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||

