AMD Radeon Pro 560X versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 560X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 560X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 195 Watt
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 711 versus 532
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 48.494 versus 46.086
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 62.405 versus 36.463
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 247.728 versus 99.577
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 3306
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 3306
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 16 July 2018 versus 22 March 2012 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 195 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 versus 532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 versus 46.086 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 versus 36.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 versus 99.577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3306 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1024
- Environ 18% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 5080 MHz
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5587 versus 3678
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 18388 versus 17548
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 989.685 versus 679.583
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.645 versus 3.96
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7222 versus 5367
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 versus 2495
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7222 versus 5367
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 versus 2495
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1006 MHz versus 1004 MHz |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 1024 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 5080 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5587 versus 3678 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18388 versus 17548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 989.685 versus 679.583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.645 versus 3.96 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7222 versus 5367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 versus 2495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7222 versus 5367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 versus 2495 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 560X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3678 | 5587 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 | 532 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17548 | 18388 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 | 46.086 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 679.583 | 989.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.96 | 4.645 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 | 36.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 | 99.577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5367 | 7222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2495 | 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5367 | 7222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2495 | 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3306 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2004 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro 560X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Polaris 21 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 16 July 2018 | 22 March 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 550 | 552 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
Prix maintenant | $579.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.83 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1004 MHz | 1006 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 195 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1058 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Performance á point flottant | 3,090.4 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.8 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | Two 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 10.0" (25.4 cm) | |
Options SLI | 3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
RAM maximale | 2048 MB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |