AMD Radeon Pro 575 versus AMD Radeon RX 570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 575 and AMD Radeon RX 570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 575
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1096 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz
- 883.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,506 gflops versus 5.1 TFLOPs
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1090.128 versus 1083.926
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 98.349 versus 79.029
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 539.686 versus 520.089
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9613 versus 9172
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9613 versus 9172
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 June 2017 versus 18 April 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1096 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,506 gflops versus 5.1 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1090.128 versus 1083.926 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.349 versus 79.029 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 versus 520.089 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9613 versus 9172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9613 versus 9172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3346 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 570
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 159.23 GTexel/s versus 140.8 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 3% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 6800 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 36107 versus 34732
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 versus 86.154
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 versus 7.88
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3624 versus 2814
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3624 versus 2814
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s versus 140.8 GTexel / s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 6800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 versus 34732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 versus 86.154 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 versus 7.88 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 versus 2814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 versus 2814 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 570
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 575 | AMD Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34732 | 36107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.154 | 105.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1090.128 | 1083.926 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 | 8.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.349 | 79.029 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 | 520.089 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9613 | 9172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2814 | 3624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9613 | 9172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2814 | 3624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3346 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro 575 | AMD Radeon RX 570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | Polaris 20 | Polaris 20 |
| Date de sortie | 5 June 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 471 | 405 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop, Laptop |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | |
| Prix maintenant | $149.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1096 MHz | 926-1168 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,506 gflops | 5.1 TFLOPs |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 140.8 GTexel / s | 159.23 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,700 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1206-1244 MHz | |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Texture Units | 128 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | 241 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 217.6 GB / s | 224 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6800 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro 575 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 560
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8760 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
AMDRadeon E6465
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470X
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile
