AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 249.6 GTexel/s versus 255.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 26% de pipelines plus haut: 3072 versus 2432
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3063.269 versus 1797.792
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 versus 3638
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 versus 3344
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 versus 3638
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 versus 3344
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 19 March 2019 versus 2 November 2017 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s versus 255.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3072 versus 2432 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 versus 1797.792 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 versus 3638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 versus 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 versus 3638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 versus 3344 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Environ 34% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 29% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1683 MHz versus 1300 MHz
- 69.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 12500 million
- 10.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14686 versus 11300
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 875 versus 784
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55314 versus 53826
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 182.11 versus 135.416
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.071 versus 12.678
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1035.984 versus 883.876
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 versus 11925
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 versus 11925
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1683 MHz versus 1300 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 12500 million |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14686 versus 11300 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 versus 784 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55314 versus 53826 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 versus 135.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 versus 12.678 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 versus 883.876 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 versus 11925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 versus 11925 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 | 14686 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 875 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53826 | 55314 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | 182.11 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | 1797.792 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | 14.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 | 1035.984 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 | 16128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 | 3638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 | 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 | 16128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 | 3638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 | 3344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6811 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Vega 10 PRO | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Greenland | GP104 |
| Génération GCN | GCN 5.0 | |
| Date de sortie | 19 March 2019 | 2 November 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 237 | 239 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Prix maintenant | $379.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1683 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1200 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 2432 |
| Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12500 million | 180 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 8,186 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 402.4 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 8008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AppleM2 Max 30-core
