AMD Radeon R4 Graphics versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R4 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 800 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 128 versus 96
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 33 Watt
- 3.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 versus 2612
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.612 versus 10.121
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 11 June 2014 versus 1 April 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz versus 775 MHz |
Pipelines | 128 versus 96 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 33 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8386 versus 2612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.612 versus 10.121 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
- Environ 94% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 12.4 GTexel / s versus 6.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 17% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 240.0 gflops versus 204.8 gflops
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 450 versus 342
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 119 versus 99
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.901 versus 4.721
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 146.913 versus 107.613
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.587 versus 0.445
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.755 versus 13.097
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1047 versus 701
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2570 versus 1338
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2035 versus 1811
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1047 versus 701
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2570 versus 1338
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2035 versus 1811
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s versus 6.4 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 240.0 gflops versus 204.8 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 450 versus 342 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 versus 99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.901 versus 4.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 146.913 versus 107.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.587 versus 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.755 versus 13.097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 versus 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2570 versus 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2035 versus 1811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 versus 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2570 versus 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2035 versus 1811 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 342 | 450 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 99 | 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8386 | 2612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.721 | 6.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 107.613 | 146.913 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.445 | 0.587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.612 | 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.097 | 22.755 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 701 | 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1338 | 2570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1811 | 2035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 701 | 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1338 | 2570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1811 | 2035 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Beema | GF117 |
Date de sortie | 11 June 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1540 | 1438 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz | 775 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 204.8 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.4 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 930 million | 585 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 938 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 2560x1600 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 2560x1600 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | DDR3 |
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 12.8 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |