AMD Radeon R9 370X versus NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 370X and NVIDIA Quadro M4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 370X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 27% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 773 MHz
- Environ 3% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 82.4 GTexel / s versus 80.39 GTexel / s
- Environ 2% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,637 gflops versus 2,573 gflops
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1139.703 versus 732.046
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.44 versus 17.725
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 versus 217.357
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 versus 6291
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 versus 3685
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 versus 6291
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 versus 3685
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 August 2015 versus 29 June 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 773 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.4 GTexel / s versus 80.39 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 2,637 gflops versus 2,573 gflops |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 versus 732.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 versus 17.725 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 versus 217.357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 versus 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 versus 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 3332 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- Environ 30% de pipelines plus haut: 1664 versus 1280
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 180 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 7% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 5600 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.548 versus 65.071
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.453 versus 5.39
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 1664 versus 1280 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 5600 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 versus 65.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 versus 5.39 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R9 370X | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 | 65.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 | 732.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 | 5.453 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 | 17.725 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 | 217.357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 | 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 | 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3332 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6692 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 683 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R9 370X | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | Trinidad | GM204 |
Date de sortie | 27 August 2015 | 29 June 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $791 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 516 | 517 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix maintenant | $765.93 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.68 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1030 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 773 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,637 gflops | 2,573 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1664 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.4 GTexel / s | 80.39 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 5,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync | |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 221 mm | 241 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 179.2 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |