AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 108.8 GTexel / s versus 36.08 GTexel / s
- 3.2x plus de pipelines: 2048 versus 640
- 3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,482 gflops versus 1,155 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.778 versus 37.761
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1285.141 versus 388.248
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.839 versus 2.428
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.347 versus 38.889
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 321.767 versus 151.016
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7037 versus 3353
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 November 2014 versus 12 March 2014 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.8 GTexel / s versus 36.08 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,482 gflops versus 1,155 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.778 versus 37.761 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1285.141 versus 388.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.839 versus 2.428 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.347 versus 38.889 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 321.767 versus 151.016 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7037 versus 3353 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- 5.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 2852
- 80.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 46
- 26.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 125.7
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 2852 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 46 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 125.7 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.778 | 37.761 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1285.141 | 388.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.839 | 2.428 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.347 | 38.889 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 321.767 | 151.016 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2852 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 46 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7037 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 125.7 | 3353 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2516 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9688 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Amethyst | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 23 November 2014 | 12 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 938 | 939 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,482 gflops | 1,155 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.8 GTexel / s | 36.08 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,000 million | 1,870 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 174.3 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5448 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX Go5200
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 Ti 4800
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon HD 8850M
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon 540X Mobile
