AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 797 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 108.8 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- 3.2x plus de pipelines: 2048 versus 640
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,482 gflops versus 1,389 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.778 versus 22.828
- 6.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1285.141 versus 210.585
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.839 versus 3.427
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.347 versus 28.662
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 321.767 versus 162.83
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7037 versus 3340
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 November 2014 versus 10 March 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 797 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.8 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,482 gflops versus 1,389 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.778 versus 22.828 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1285.141 versus 210.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.839 versus 3.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.347 versus 28.662 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 321.767 versus 162.83 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7037 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 versus 2852
- 80.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 versus 46
- 26.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 versus 125.7
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 2852 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 46 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 125.7 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.778 | 22.828 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1285.141 | 210.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.839 | 3.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.347 | 28.662 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 321.767 | 162.83 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2852 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 46 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7037 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 125.7 | 3340 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3048 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10394 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Amethyst | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 23 November 2014 | 10 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 899 | 900 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,482 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.8 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,000 million | 3,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 915 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1152 or 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 174.3 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5448 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
ATIRadeon HD 5550
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 470M
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon R5 340 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon Vega 11
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
