AMD Radeon Vega 11 versus AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 11 and AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Soutien API. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 11
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 7.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 53.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2475 versus 46
- 26.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 versus 125.7
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 23 November 2014 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2475 versus 46 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 125.7 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
- 2.8x plus de vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 90% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 108.8 GTexel / s versus 57.2 GTexel / s
- 2.9x plus de pipelines: 2048 versus 704
- Environ 90% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,482 gflops versus 1,830 gflops
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.778 versus 41.582
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1285.141 versus 371.843
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.839 versus 3.156
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.347 versus 52.449
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 321.767 versus 248.838
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2852 versus 2475
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7037 versus 3343
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.8 GTexel / s versus 57.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 704 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,482 gflops versus 1,830 gflops |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.778 versus 41.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1285.141 versus 371.843 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.839 versus 3.156 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.347 versus 52.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 321.767 versus 248.838 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2852 versus 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7037 versus 3343 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 11
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 11 | AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1838 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 490 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13026 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.582 | 71.778 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 371.843 | 1285.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.156 | 5.839 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 | 75.347 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 | 321.767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2156 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2475 | 2852 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 7037 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2156 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2475 | 46 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 125.7 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Vega 11 | AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | Owl | Amethyst |
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 23 November 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 895 | 898 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,830 gflops | 3,482 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 704 | 2048 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 57.2 GTexel / s | 108.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 5,000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 174.3 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5448 MHz | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Vega 11 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 448 Go
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5300
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375X
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
AMDRadeon R5 340 OEM
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
AppleM2 8-core
