AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 215 Watt
- 1101.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7709 versus 7
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 21 Jan 2020 versus 2 July 2019 |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 215 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3718 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7709 versus 7 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Environ 42% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1130 MHz
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1560 MHz
- Environ 11% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 2304
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- 9.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18252 versus 13685
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 885 versus 880
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 99912 versus 64864
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 293.508 versus 207.909
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 versus 3560.776
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 versus 20.486
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 versus 148.938
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 versus 1111.648
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 versus 13621
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 versus 13621
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1130 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1560 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 2304 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18252 versus 13685 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 versus 880 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99912 versus 64864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 versus 207.909 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 versus 3560.776 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 versus 20.486 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 versus 148.938 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 versus 1111.648 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 versus 13621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 versus 13621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13685 | 18252 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 880 | 885 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64864 | 99912 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | 4045.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | 29.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | 158.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | 1438.826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7709 | 7 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Nom de code | Navi 10 XLE | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 21 Jan 2020 | 2 July 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 192 | 133 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1130 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 215 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10300 million | 13.6 B |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 650 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | 2-Slot |
Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |