AMD Radeon RX 6600 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 6600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1626 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 44% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2491 MHz versus 1725 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 8 nm
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 132 Watt versus 220 Watt
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 290.312 versus 182.055
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 26778 versus 13566
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 69225 versus 31930
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 26778 versus 13566
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 69225 versus 31930
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 Oct 2021 versus 1 Sep 2020 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1626 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 2491 MHz versus 1725 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 132 Watt versus 220 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 290.312 versus 182.055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 26778 versus 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 69225 versus 31930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 26778 versus 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 69225 versus 31930 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Environ 14% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 317.4 GTexel/s versus 279.0 GTexel/s
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 5888 versus 1792
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 versus 15097
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 versus 882
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 versus 73020
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 versus 260.061
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 versus 5472.868
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 versus 20.421
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 versus 1152.228
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 versus 19713
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 versus 19713
- 2.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 versus 1492
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 317.4 GTexel/s versus 279.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 5888 versus 1792 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 versus 15097 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 versus 882 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 versus 73020 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 versus 260.061 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 versus 5472.868 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 versus 20.421 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 versus 1152.228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 versus 19713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 versus 19713 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 versus 1492 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 6600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15097 | 22253 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 | 999 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 73020 | 123479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 260.061 | 453.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5472.868 | 5803.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.421 | 40.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 290.312 | 182.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.228 | 1664.554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19713 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 26778 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 69225 | 31930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19713 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 26778 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 69225 | 31930 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1492 | 3163 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 6600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Nom de code | Navi 23 XL | GA104 |
Date de sortie | 13 Oct 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 38 | 44 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 2491 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 28 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1626 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 558.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.86 TFLOPS (2:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.928 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1792 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 159.4 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 279.0 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 132 Watt | 220 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 11060 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Hauteur | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | 550 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Largeur | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |