AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1626 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 2491 MHz vs 1725 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 132 Watt vs 220 Watt
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 290.312 vs 184.548
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 26778 vs 13566
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 69225 vs 31930
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 26778 vs 13566
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 69225 vs 31930

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

• Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 317.4 GTexel/s vs 279.0 GTexel/s
• 3.3x more pipelines: 5888 vs 1792
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22415 vs 15116
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 876
• Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 124910 vs 71325
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 452.561 vs 260.061
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 5472.868
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.794 vs 20.421
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1634.218 vs 1152.228
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 19713
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 19713
• Around 68% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13608 vs 8086

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	15116 22415
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	876 999
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	71325 124910
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	260.061 452.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5472.868 5803.174
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.421 40.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	290.312 184.548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1152.228 1634.218
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19713 31716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26778 13566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	69225 31930
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19713 31716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26778 13566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	69225 31930
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	8086 13608

Compare specifications (specs)