AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 37% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 950 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 132.07 versus 86.304
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 1 January 2016 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 950 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 versus 86.304 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 924 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.869 versus 25.891
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.535 versus 365.4
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.351 versus 2.104
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 924 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 versus 25.891 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.535 versus 365.4 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 versus 2.104 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.323 versus 37.17 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1584 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8805 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 | 56.869 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 365.4 | 917.535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 | 3.351 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 | 37.323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 | 86.304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1514 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2433 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1514 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2433 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 705 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Owl | GM206 |
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 1 January 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 950 | 1175 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 924 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 2,940 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,946 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 60.8 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded avec des autres
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX Go5600
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
AMDFirePro V4900
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
IntelIris Graphics 550
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
NVIDIAGeForce 945M
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
NVIDIAQuadro M520 Mobile
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 2
