AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition versus AMD FirePro W9100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition and AMD FirePro W9100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 49% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1382 MHz versus 930 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 409.6 GTexel / s versus 163.7 GTexel / s
- Environ 45% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 2816
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 13,107 gflops versus 5,238 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 300 Watt versus 750 Watt
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13327 versus 7987
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 75705 versus 43046
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 190.25 versus 106.585
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3611.018 versus 1878.403
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.789 versus 9.751
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.113 versus 82.208
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1373.944 versus 511.115
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12980 versus 9143
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12980 versus 9143
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 versus 26 March 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1382 MHz versus 930 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 409.6 GTexel / s versus 163.7 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4096 versus 2816 |
| Performance á point flottant | 13,107 gflops versus 5,238 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt versus 750 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13327 versus 7987 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 75705 versus 43046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.25 versus 106.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3611.018 versus 1878.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.789 versus 9.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.113 versus 82.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1373.944 versus 511.115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12980 versus 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12980 versus 9143 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W9100
- 2.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 1890 MHz
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 versus 3718
- 9.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 versus 3356
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 versus 3718
- 9.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 versus 3356
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 1890 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 752 versus 750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8219 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 32085 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8219 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 32085 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | AMD FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13327 | 7987 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 752 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 75705 | 43046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.25 | 106.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3611.018 | 1878.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.789 | 9.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.113 | 82.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1373.944 | 511.115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12980 | 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 32085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12980 | 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 32085 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7074 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | AMD FirePro W9100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Vega 10 | Hawaii |
| Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 | 26 March 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 199 | 189 |
| Prix maintenant | $999.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.37 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1600 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1382 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 13,107 gflops | 5,238 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 2816 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 409.6 GTexel / s | 163.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 6,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 275 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB / s | 320 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition avec des autres
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition vs
AppleA14 Bionic
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition vs
AMDRadeon 780M
