Intel HD Graphics 4600 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 988 versus 296
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 versus 475
- 4.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 versus 657
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 988 versus 296
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 versus 475
- 4.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 versus 657
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 versus 28 June 2011 |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 versus 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 versus 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 versus 657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 versus 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 versus 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 versus 657 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
- Environ 44% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 575 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 32.2 billion / sec versus 5 GTexel / s
- 16.8x plus de pipelines: 336 versus 20
- 15.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 772.8 gflops versus 50 gflops
- 3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1873 versus 630
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 versus 314
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5696 versus 3210
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 versus 8.844
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 533.677 versus 171.17
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.681 versus 1.115
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.229 versus 10.385
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.187 versus 12.361
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 575 MHz versus 400 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.2 billion / sec versus 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 336 versus 20 |
Performance á point flottant | 772.8 gflops versus 50 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1873 versus 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 versus 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5696 versus 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 versus 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 533.677 versus 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.681 versus 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.229 versus 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.187 versus 12.361 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | 1873 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 361 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | 5696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | 14.911 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | 533.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | 1.681 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | 31.229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | 66.187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 657 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | GF114 |
Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 | 28 June 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1349 | 1352 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz | 575 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 50 gflops | 772.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 20 | 336 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5 GTexel / s | 32.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 392 million | 1,950 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 336 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
RAM maximale | 1536 MB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72.0 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI |