Intel HD Graphics 520 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 520
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 7.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 106 Watt
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 versus 14.758
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.243 versus 0.965
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 28.182 versus 27.656
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 13 September 2010 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 106 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 versus 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 versus 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 versus 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 versus 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- 5.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1566 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 8x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 24
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1322 versus 864
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 310 versus 209
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4907 versus 3993
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 302.509 versus 143.083
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.925 versus 12.958
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2160 versus 951
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 versus 1462
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2160 versus 951
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 versus 1462
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1566 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 versus 24 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1322 versus 864 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 310 versus 209 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4907 versus 3993 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 302.509 versus 143.083 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.925 versus 12.958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 versus 951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 versus 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 versus 951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 versus 1462 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | 1322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 310 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 | 4907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | GF106 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 13 September 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1381 | 1130 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $129 | |
Prix maintenant | $64.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 26.46 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1566 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 106 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,170 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Performance á point flottant | 601.3 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.1 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 57.7 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |