Intel HD Graphics 520 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 520
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 10.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 160 Watt
- 42.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 768 MB
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 versus 21.445
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 12 July 2010 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 160 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 768 MB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 versus 21.445 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
- 2.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 675 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 14x plus de pipelines: 336 versus 24
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2272 versus 864
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 388 versus 209
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7860 versus 3993
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 617.847 versus 143.083
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.823 versus 1.243
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.222 versus 12.958
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.61 versus 28.182
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3351 versus 951
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 1462
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3337
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3351 versus 951
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 1462
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3337
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 675 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 336 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2272 versus 864 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 versus 209 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7860 versus 3993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 617.847 versus 143.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.823 versus 1.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.222 versus 12.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.61 versus 28.182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3351 versus 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3351 versus 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3337 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | 2272 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 388 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 | 7860 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 21.445 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | 617.847 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | 1.823 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | 27.222 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | 40.61 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | GF104 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 12 July 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1381 | 917 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Prix maintenant | $89.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 34.71 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 675 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 336 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,950 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 907.2 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.8 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 8.25"(210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 768 MB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 520 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelHD Graphics
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 620
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
