Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 versus NVIDIA Quadro K620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and NVIDIA Quadro K620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 41 Watt
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.485 versus 22.112
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.888 versus 1.427
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.014 versus 15.363
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 720 versus 702
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 3 January 2017 versus 22 July 2014 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 41 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 versus 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 versus 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 versus 15.363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 versus 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 versus 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 versus 702 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K620
- 3.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1124 MHz versus 1100 MHz
- 8x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 48
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2233 versus 1346
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 472 versus 340
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 versus 6440
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 297.631 versus 246.614
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 versus 42.981
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 versus 2306
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 versus 1514
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 versus 2306
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 versus 1514
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 versus 48 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2233 versus 1346 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 472 versus 340 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 versus 6440 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 versus 246.614 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 versus 42.981 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 versus 2306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 versus 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 versus 2306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 versus 1514 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1346 | 2233 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | 472 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6440 | 6869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | 15.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | 99.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 | 702 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT3e | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 3 January 2017 | 22 July 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1159 | 974 |
Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $189.89 | |
Prix maintenant | $189.93 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 41 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,870 million |
Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 160 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 32 GB | 2 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | 128 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |