Intel UHD Graphics 600 versus AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 600 and AMD Radeon R5 Graphics pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel UHD Graphics 600

versus

AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 600

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 5 Watt versus 15 Watt

Date de sortie	11 December 2017 versus 31 May 2016
Processus de fabrication	14 nm versus 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	5 Watt versus 15 Watt

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 800 MHz versus 750 MHz
21.3x plus de pipelines: 256 versus 12
3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2981 versus 1004
Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.331 versus 5.952
2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 119.568 versus 56.77
Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.543 versus 0.427
2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.649 versus 5.876
6.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 versus 6.882
2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 versus 476
Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 versus 1000
Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1915 versus 1701
2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 versus 476
Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 versus 1000
Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 versus 1701

Caractéristiques
Vitesse augmenté	800 MHz versus 750 MHz
Pipelines	256 versus 12
Référence
Geekbench - OpenCL	2981 versus 1004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.331 versus 5.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	119.568 versus 56.77
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.543 versus 0.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	12.649 versus 5.876
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	42.459 versus 6.882
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	966 versus 476
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1363 versus 1000
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1915 versus 1701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	966 versus 476
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1363 versus 1000
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1915 versus 1701

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1004

2981

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.952

6.331

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

56.77

119.568

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.427

0.543

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.876

12.649

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.882

42.459

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

476

966

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1000

1363

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1701

1915

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

476

966

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1000

1363

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1701

1915

Nom	Intel UHD Graphics 600	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
PassMark - G3D Mark	318
PassMark - G2D Mark	92
Geekbench - OpenCL	1004	2981
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.952	6.331
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	56.77	119.568
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.427	0.543
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	5.876	12.649
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	6.882	42.459
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	476	966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1000	1363
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1701	1915
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	476	966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1000	1363
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1701	1915
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel UHD Graphics 600	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 3.0
Nom de code	Gemini Lake GT1	Wani
Date de sortie	11 December 2017	31 May 2016
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1624	1551
Genre	Laptop	Desktop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	750 MHz	800 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	200 MHz	200 MHz
Processus de fabrication	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	12	256
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	5 Watt	15 Watt
Compte de transistor	189 million	2,410 million
Performance á point flottant		388.1 gflops
Taux de remplissage de la texture		12.13 GTexel / s
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	IGP
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Mémoire
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit
Genre de mémoire	DDR4 / LPDDR4	System Shared
Mémoire partagé	1
Technologies
Quick Sync