Intel UHD Graphics 600 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 5 Watt versus 19 Watt
Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 versus 27 March 2014 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt versus 19 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- 4.8x plus de vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 200 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 12
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 versus 318
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 versus 92
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1946 versus 1004
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.705 versus 5.952
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 100.391 versus 56.77
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.441 versus 0.427
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.146 versus 5.876
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.64 versus 6.882
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 977 versus 476
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 versus 1000
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1833 versus 1701
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 977 versus 476
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 versus 1000
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1833 versus 1701
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 versus 12 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 versus 318 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 versus 92 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 versus 1004 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 versus 5.952 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 versus 56.77 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 versus 0.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 versus 5.876 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 versus 6.882 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 versus 476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 versus 1000 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 versus 1701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 versus 476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 versus 1000 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 versus 1701 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 318 | 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 92 | 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1004 | 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 | 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.77 | 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.427 | 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.876 | 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.882 | 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 476 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 476 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 | 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 192 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler 2.0 |
Nom de code | Gemini Lake GT1 | GK208B |
Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 | 27 March 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1624 | 1488 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $34.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 750 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 954 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 192 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 19 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 292 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Performance á point flottant | 366.3 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.26 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |