Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus AMD Radeon RX 480

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon RX 480 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620

  • La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
  • 10x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 150 Watt
  • 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 4 GB
Date de sortie 1 September 2017 versus 29 June 2016
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt versus 150 Watt
Taille de mémore maximale 32 GB versus 4 GB

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 480

  • 3.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1120 MHz versus 300 MHz
  • Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1266 MHz versus 1150 MHz
  • 96x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 24
  • 8.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8593 versus 1043
  • 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 versus 242
  • 8.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39517 versus 4592
  • 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 103.851 versus 27.062
  • 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 769.541 versus 273.504
  • 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.593 versus 1.777
  • 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 67.879 versus 19.939
  • 18.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 597.772 versus 31.881
  • 8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11172 versus 1397
  • 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 versus 878
  • Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 versus 2227
  • 8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11172 versus 1397
  • 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 versus 878
  • Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 versus 2227
  • 11.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4172 versus 366
Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau 1120 MHz versus 300 MHz
Vitesse augmenté 1266 MHz versus 1150 MHz
Pipelines 2304 versus 24
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark 8593 versus 1043
PassMark - G2D Mark 775 versus 242
Geekbench - OpenCL 39517 versus 4592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 103.851 versus 27.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 769.541 versus 273.504
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.593 versus 1.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 67.879 versus 19.939
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 597.772 versus 31.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11172 versus 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 versus 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 versus 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11172 versus 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 versus 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 versus 2227
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4172 versus 366

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 480

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1043
8593
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
242
775
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4592
39517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
27.062
103.851
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
273.504
769.541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.777
7.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.939
67.879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
31.881
597.772
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1397
11172
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
878
3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2227
3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1397
11172
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
878
3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2227
3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
366
4172
Nom Intel UHD Graphics 620 AMD Radeon RX 480
PassMark - G3D Mark 1043 8593
PassMark - G2D Mark 242 775
Geekbench - OpenCL 4592 39517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.062 103.851
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 273.504 769.541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.777 7.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.939 67.879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 31.881 597.772
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1397 11172
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 878 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2227 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1397 11172
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 878 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2227 3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 366 4172

Comparer les caractéristiques

Intel UHD Graphics 620 AMD Radeon RX 480

Essentiel

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 4.0
Nom de code Kaby Lake GT2 Ellesmere
Date de sortie 1 September 2017 29 June 2016
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance 1378 344
Genre Laptop Desktop
Conception Radeon RX 400 Series
Génération GCN 4th Gen
Prix de sortie (MSRP) $229
Prix maintenant $299.99
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) 39.12

Infos techniques

Vitesse augmenté 1150 MHz 1266 MHz
Vitesse du noyau 300 MHz 1120 MHz
Processus de fabrication 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 24 2304
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt
Compte de transistor 189 million 5,700 million
Unités de Compute 36
Performance á point flottant 5.8 TFLOPs
GPU Power 110 Watt
Stream Processors 2304
Taux de remplissage de la texture 182.3 GTexel / s

Sorties et ports de vidéo

Connecteurs d’écran No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Soutien de DisplayPort
Soutien de Dual-link DVI
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bridgeless CrossFire
Soutien de bus n / a
Longeur 241 mm
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) 500 Watt
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires 1x 6-pin

Soutien API

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Mantle
OpenCL 2.0
Vulkan

Mémoire

RAM maximale 32 GB 4 GB
Largeur du bus mémoire 64 / 128 Bit 256 bit
Genre de mémoire LPDDR3 / DDR4 GDDR5
Mémoire partagé 1 0
Bande passante de la mémoire 224 GB/s
Vitesse de mémoire 7000 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
Enduro
FreeSync
FRTC
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HD3D
HDMI 2.0b
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready
ZeroCore