Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus AMD Radeon RX 480
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon RX 480 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- 10x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 150 Watt
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 4 GB
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 29 June 2016 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 4 GB |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 480
- 3.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1120 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1266 MHz versus 1150 MHz
- 96x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 24
- 8.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8593 versus 1043
- 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 versus 242
- 8.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39517 versus 4592
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 103.851 versus 27.062
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 769.541 versus 273.504
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.593 versus 1.777
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 67.879 versus 19.939
- 18.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 597.772 versus 31.881
- 8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11172 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 versus 878
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 versus 2227
- 8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11172 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 versus 878
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 versus 2227
- 11.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4172 versus 366
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1120 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1266 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 24 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8593 versus 1043 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 775 versus 242 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39517 versus 4592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 versus 27.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 769.541 versus 273.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 versus 1.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 versus 19.939 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 versus 31.881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 versus 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 versus 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 2227 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4172 versus 366 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 480
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon RX 480 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1043 | 8593 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 | 775 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 39517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 103.851 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 769.541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 7.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 67.879 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 597.772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 11172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 11172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 366 | 4172 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon RX 480 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | Ellesmere |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 29 June 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1378 | 344 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
Prix maintenant | $299.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 39.12 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1120 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 5,700 million |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Performance á point flottant | 5.8 TFLOPs | |
GPU Power | 110 Watt | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 182.3 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien de bus | n / a | |
Longeur | 241 mm | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 bit |
Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |