Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 7.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 106 Watt
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 versus 14.758
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 versus 0.965
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 versus 14.925
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.881 versus 27.656
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 13 September 2010 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 106 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 versus 14.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 versus 0.965 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 versus 14.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 versus 27.656 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- 5.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1566 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 8x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 24
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1322 versus 1042
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 310 versus 241
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4907 versus 4592
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 302.509 versus 273.504
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2160 versus 1397
- 3.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 versus 878
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 versus 2227
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2160 versus 1397
- 3.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 versus 878
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 versus 2227
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1566 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 192 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1322 versus 1042 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 310 versus 241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4907 versus 4592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 302.509 versus 273.504 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 versus 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 versus 2227 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 1322 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 310 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 4907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 14.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 302.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 0.965 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 14.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 27.656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 2160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 2160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GF106 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 13 September 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1380 | 1130 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $129 | |
| Prix maintenant | $64.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 26.46 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1566 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 106 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,170 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 601.3 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.1 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 57.7 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 620 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
