NVIDIA GeForce 710M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 710M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 710M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 24% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 297.6 gflops versus 240.0 gflops
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 33 Watt
- Environ 13% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 454 versus 450
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 125 versus 119
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 148.156 versus 146.913
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.718 versus 10.121
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 versus 2570
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 versus 2035
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 versus 2570
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 versus 2035
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 24 July 2013 versus 1 April 2013 |
Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops versus 240.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 33 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 454 versus 450 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 125 versus 119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 148.156 versus 146.913 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.718 versus 10.121 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 versus 2570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 versus 2035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 versus 2570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 versus 2035 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 775 MHz versus 719 MHz
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 938 MHz versus 800 MHz
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2612 versus 2457
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.901 versus 6.51
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.587 versus 0.577
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.755 versus 19.855
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1047 versus 1030
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1047 versus 1030
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz versus 719 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 938 MHz versus 800 MHz |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2612 versus 2457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.901 versus 6.51 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.587 versus 0.577 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.755 versus 19.855 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 versus 1030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 versus 1030 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 710M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 710M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 454 | 450 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 125 | 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2457 | 2612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.51 | 6.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 148.156 | 146.913 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.577 | 0.587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.718 | 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.855 | 22.755 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1030 | 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 | 2570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | 2035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1030 | 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 | 2570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | 2035 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce 710M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GK208 | GF117 |
Date de sortie | 24 July 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1387 | 1438 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | 938 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 719 MHz | 775 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 2560x1600 | Up to 2560x1600 |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 2560x1600 | Up to 2560x1600 |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | Up to 1920x1200 |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |