NVIDIA GeForce 940M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 940M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 56% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1176 MHz versus 753 MHz
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 144
- 2.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 903.2 gflops versus 388.8 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 6% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1127 versus 653
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 154 versus 112
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5982 versus 2915
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.98 versus 7.699
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.307 versus 0.727
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.837 versus 12.581
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 101.399 versus 21.909
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2132 versus 1134
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3065 versus 2265
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 2827
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2132 versus 1134
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3065 versus 2265
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 2827
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 27 October 2011 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz versus 753 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 144 |
| Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops versus 388.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 35 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1127 versus 653 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 versus 112 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5982 versus 2915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 versus 7.699 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 versus 0.727 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 versus 12.581 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 versus 21.909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 versus 1134 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 versus 2265 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 2827 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 versus 1134 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 versus 2265 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 2827 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 252.895 versus 168.449
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 252.895 versus 168.449 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1127 | 653 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 | 112 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5982 | 2915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 | 7.699 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.449 | 252.895 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 | 0.727 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 | 12.581 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 | 21.909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 | 1134 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 | 2265 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 2827 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 | 1134 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 | 2265 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 2827 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GM108 | GF106 |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 27 October 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1184 | 1424 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz | 753 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1072 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops | 388.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 144 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.22 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,170 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | Up to 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3\DDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 940M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645M
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDFirePro W2100
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon R8 M350DX
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M430
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM
