NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M versus AMD Radeon HD 6570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M and AMD Radeon HD 6570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 753 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 14% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 40 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 654 versus 552
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2859 versus 1549
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.699 versus 4.278
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.727 versus 0.464
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2265 versus 1044
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2827 versus 2716
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2265 versus 1044
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2827 versus 2716
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 October 2011 versus 7 February 2011 |
Vitesse augmenté | 753 MHz versus 650 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 40 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 654 versus 552 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2859 versus 1549 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.699 versus 4.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.727 versus 0.464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2265 versus 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2827 versus 2716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2265 versus 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2827 versus 2716 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6570
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 480 versus 144
- Environ 60% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 624.0 gflops versus 388.8 gflops
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 versus 111
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 255.525 versus 252.895
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.633 versus 12.581
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 59.183 versus 21.909
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1296 versus 1134
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1296 versus 1134
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 480 versus 144 |
Performance á point flottant | 624.0 gflops versus 388.8 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 versus 111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 versus 252.895 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.633 versus 12.581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.183 versus 21.909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1296 versus 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 versus 1134 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | AMD Radeon HD 6570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 654 | 552 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 111 | 217 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2859 | 1549 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.699 | 4.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 252.895 | 255.525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.727 | 0.464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.581 | 13.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.909 | 59.183 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1134 | 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2265 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2827 | 2716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1134 | 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2265 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2827 | 2716 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 846 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GF106 | Thames |
Date de sortie | 27 October 2011 | 7 February 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1430 | 1432 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
Prix maintenant | $49.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.92 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 753 MHz | 650 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | Up to 144 | |
Performance á point flottant | 388.8 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 144 | 480 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 40 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,170 million | 716 million |
Stream Processors | 480 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Longeur | 168 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3\DDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |